Search This Blog

Wednesday, 30 April 2025

Alberta oil and gas companies could install solar panels to avoid cleanup costs | The Narwhal

Alberta oil and gas companies could install solar panels to avoid cleanup costs | The Narwhal

Oil and gas companies could avoid full reclamation of old well sites in Alberta if they put renewable energy projects on the disturbed land.

That’s one of several dozen ideas offered in a new report commissioned by the Alberta government. The reports looks at how to manage the province’s persistent oil and gas pollution problem, and contrasts sharply with moves by the same government to restrict renewable energy following a seven-month moratorium, and ensure companies provide full clean-up costs upfront for wind and solar projects. 

The report, written by current Alberta Energy Regulator board member and long-time industry insider David Yager, says oil and gas well sites could be “utilized for solar power generation instead of undergoing full reclamation, delivering both environmental and economic benefits.”

Critics say the idea contradicts other government policies — especially around renewables, which could make it unrealistic. 

“They justified that moratorium and the restrictions on the basis of end-of-life cleanup. Now they’re saying that, in a way, renewables could be used to help the oil and gas industry avoid its reclamation,” Phillip Meintzer, a spokesperson for the Coalition for Responsible Energy, said in an interview. 

“Would someone even be allowed to put renewables on these well sites because of the restrictions that were put in place? I don’t know,” he said. The coalition, made up of environmental organizations, focuses on energy regulation. 

It’s unclear how much remediation a company could avoid by installing renewables on its leases and is only one of many recommendations and ideas presented in the report. Meintzer wants more details to understand what’s on the table and just how much cleanup a company could avoid. 

Meintzer says his organization is focusing on ensuring the polluter pays principle — the idea that a company is responsible for cleaning up the mess it leaves behind — is upheld and costs are not downloaded on to taxpayers. 

Sunday, 27 April 2025

A century ago, the Victoria Cougars won the Stanley Cup in Oak Bay - Greater Victoria News

A century ago, the Victoria Cougars won the Stanley Cup in Oak Bay - Greater Victoria News

A century ago, the Victoria Cougars won the Stanley Cup in Oak Bay

Oak Bay is not a mere footnote in hockey history; it offers an exciting chapter of innovation and triumph

When ice hockey’s greatest prize, the storied Stanley Cup, visits Oak Bay in March this year, local sports fans will celebrate its homecoming, a century in the making, recalling when our capital city played a starring role in Canada's professional ice hockey development. On March 30, 1925, the Victoria Cougars triumphed over the defending champion Montreal Canadiens, to win Lord Stanley’s glittering silver bowl—hockey’s holy grail—in front of thousands of boisterous fans in the Patrick Arena on Cadboro Bay Road, right here in Oak Bay.  

For those in the know, Oak Bay is not a mere footnote in hockey history, but offers a fulsome and exciting chapter of innovation and triumph during the sport’s formative years. Several exciting hockey ‘firsts’ happened here, including the introduction of the forward pass and the blueline. Oak Bay was once home to the world’s first purpose-built indoor artificial ice hockey rink and hosted the first professional hockey game played on artificial ice in Canada.  

That story begins with two famous brothers, Lester and Frank Patrick, both skilled hockey players, innovators and ambitious businessmen, who along with their father Joseph, founded the Pacific Coast Hockey Association (PCHA) in 1911. To support their new league, the Patrick family built the 4,200-seat Patrick Arena at the corner of Cadboro Bay Road and Epworth Street (across from today’s Oak Bay High School) and the 10,500-seat Denman Arena on West Georgia Street in Vancouver—both constructed within a year of announcing their plans for the new league. The arena cost over $100,000, opened to great fanfare on Christmas Day 1911, and hosted the first game of the new PCHA on January 2, 1912, between the Victoria and New Westminster teams. A newspaper called it a spectacle featuring “the fastest men and the fastest game on earth.”  

stanleycupob-3
The 1924-1925 Victoria Cougars ice hockey team were Stanley Cup champions. Courtesy of B.C Archives

With the PCHA as their experimental laboratory, the Patrick brothers brought many innovations to ice hockey, including numbering players’ jerseys, awarding assists, substituting players ‘on the fly,’ as well as introducing a farm system and pioneering a post-season playoff format. They also invented the penalty shot, first scored by Victoria player Tommy Dunderdale during an away game against the Vancouver Millionaires at the Denman Arena in 1921. 

Victoria’s PCHA team, now famously remembered under the Cougars’ moniker, was known by various names over the years, both official and unofficial, including the “Senators,” “Aristocrats” and “Capitals.” 

The PCHA operated from 1911 to 1924, until merging with the Western Canada Hockey League. Under this league’s banner, the Victoria Cougars competed for and won the Stanley Cup, already then well established as ice hockey’s most prestigious prize. 

Originally costing ten pounds sterling, and crafted by a British silversmith, the Stanley Cup is the oldest trophy in North American professional sports. Steeped in myths and legends intertwined with those of Canada itself, it was commissioned in 1892 by Lord Stanley of Preston, then serving as Governor General of the Dominion of Canada. He gifted it as an annual prize awarded to Canada's top amateur ice hockey team. Professional hockey teams became eligible to win it in 1906. From 1915 to 1926, the champion teams of the two main professional hockey leagues at the time, the National Hockey Association/National Hockey League and the Pacific Coast Hockey Association/Western Canada Hockey League competed with each other for Cup glory.  

During the 1924-25 Western Canada Hockey League season, the Victoria Cougars finished third out of six teams in 28 regular season games, behind the Calgary Tigers and the Saskatoon Sheiks. In the first two playoff rounds, the Cougars beat both Saskatoon and Calgary to advance, as WCHL league champions, to the Stanley Cup final against the defending champions Montreal Canadiens from the NHL. 

The Cup final that year was a best-of-five format, and the Cougars had ‘home ice advantage’ as all games were played on the West Coast. Three of the four games were held in Oak Bay’s arena, with one played in front of an overcapacity crowd of 11,000 at the Denman Arena in Vancouver. 

The Cougars won the first two games, 5-2 and 3-1 respectively, before the Canadiens mounted a comeback, notching a win in the third game 4-2. The fifth and final game was played to a sold-out crowd in Oak Bay, who cheered on the Cougars to a thrilling and decisive 6-1 victory, winning the series and the Stanley Cup three games to one. The Daily Colonist proudly proclaimed: “Cougars Win Stanley Cup. Victoria’s Own Are World Hockey Champions.” 

The Victoria Cougars were both the last non-NHL team and most recent British Columbia team to win the Stanley Cup. They made it to the Cup final again in 1926 but failed to repeat as champions, losing to the Montreal Maroons at the newly built Forum in Montreal. Shortly afterwards, the team was sold and moved to the U.S., initially becoming the Detroit Cougars, then the Falcons and finally the Detroit Red Wings, one of the NHL’s famous “Original Six” franchises, in 1932.  

The Patrick Arena burnt to the ground on Remembrance Day 1929 in a fire that was likely deliberately set. Except for a commemorative banner honouring the 1924-25 Victoria Cougars which proudly hangs from the rafters of the Memorial Centre downtown, for decades little trace of Oak Bay’s starring role in hockey history remained until 2001, when a cairn was installed on the grounds of Oak Bay High School engraved with an image of the Stanley Cup and a description of our community’s pioneering role. 

cougarsob
In 2001, a cairn was installed on the grounds of Oak Bay High School to commemorate the 1925 Victoria Cougars’ Stanley Cup victory and Oak Bay’s pioneering role in ice hockey history. Ivan Watson

The 1925 Victoria Cougars have been inducted into the Greater Victoria and B.C. Sports Halls of Fame. Of all the memorable moments in Vancouver Island sporting history, their Stanley Cup victory over the Montreal Canadiens remains the greatest. Even today, Oak Bay residents who live by the former arena site occasionally dig up an old beaten-up hockey puck or two while tending to their garden—and in doing so discover a keepsake of an errant ‘slapshot from the past,’ from a bygone era when Oak Bay was ‘centre ice’ of the hockey universe, and the 1925 Stanley Cup winning Cougars its greatest champions.  

The Victoria Hockey Legacy Society is planning a “Century Celebration” in honour of the 1925 Victoria Cougars, from March 29 – 30. For info, visit: vhls.ca. Other events are being planned across the region for March 28-30.

This article is from the spring edition of Tweed.

Wednesday, 23 April 2025

Federal Liberals surging in B.C. in ways not seen since Trudeau-mania: poll - Greater Victoria News

Federal Liberals surging in B.C. in ways not seen since Trudeau-mania: poll - Greater Victoria News
Once dominated by the federal New Democrats, the southern tip of Vancouver Island could see spots of federal Liberal red, while its northern parts could turn federal Conservative blue
250407-bpd-carney-richmond-rally5
Liberal Party of Canada Leader Mark Carney speaks to a packed ballroom at the Sheraton Vancouver Airport Hotel in Richmond on Monday, April 7. It was his second day in B.C., and second rally in the province.

Federal Liberal Leader Mark Carney may have left B.C. after a two-day swing, including a stop in Richmond Monday night, but a poll released Tuesday points to solidifying strength in Canada's most western province not seen since the Trudeau-mania of the late 1960s.

The Research Co. poll shows the federal Liberals (44 per cent) leading the federal Conservatives under Pierre Poilievre by six points in B.C. Nationally, the federal Liberals are leading the Conservatives 44 per cent to 36 per cent.

"We have to go back to 1968 to have a level of support for the Liberals similar to what they have right now," Mario Canseco, president of Research Co., said. "In the first Trudeau-mania election, they got 42 per cent of the vote in B.C. They are at 44 per cent, so it's historic."

Canseco added that the current support for the federal Liberals puts them ahead of their 2015 showing when they won 35 per cent of the popular vote and picked up seats in areas that had not voted for the federal Liberals in decades, such as Kelowna. 

"(The) explanation is essentially the collapse of the NDP vote across the country and that includes British Columbia," Canseco said. "They are in the single digits everywhere." 

Nationally, the federal New Democrats are polling at eight per cent, equal to their level of support in British Columbia. That means that New Democrats are on pace to win less than half of their popular vote (17 per cent) in 2021. 

Canseco said some New Democratic voters are going to the Conservatives. "But many of them are going to the Liberals and it raises the question about the viability of some long-term incumbents," he said. 

New Democrats held 24 seats at dissolution, with 12 of those in British Columbia, including five seats on Vancouver Island. A sixth New Democrat MP -- Randall Garrison -- retired before dissolution. Four incumbents (Lisa Marie Barron, Laurel Collins, Gord Johns and Alistair MacGregor) are running again in their Vancouver Island ridings, while Rachel Blaney won't be running in North Island-Powell River. 

Carney Sunday campaigned in Collins' riding of Victoria, then made an environmental announcement in Saanich-Gulf Islands, the riding of long-time federal Green MP Elizabeth.

Historically, federal Liberals have done well in Metro Vancouver with federal Conservatives and federal New Democrats competing against each other in parts of the province, including Vancouver Island. 

Canseco said Carney is fishing in NDP and Green waters because the Liberals sense an opportunity to have a massive majority government based on their large and growing leads in Ontario and Quebec. 

"It would be rare to see pockets of (federal Liberal red) on (Vancouver Island), but if you start to see this trend of the vote for the NDP dropping and the vote for the Liberals rising, you could see some red," he said. "But it also raises the question of an interesting strategic voting decision, particularly in the north (of Vancouver Island)."

If New Democratic support in the northern half of Vancouver Island drops with the federal Liberals gaining, federal Conservatives, including controversial candidate Aaron Gunn, could end up as winners, he said. 

In other words, surging Liberals could actually benefit federal Conservatives on northern Vancouver Island by taking away support for New Democrats. "I think that is a real possibility in the north," Canseco said. 

Conservatives, for their part, have identified Vancouver Island, along with parts of B.C.'s interior for pick-ups and incumbent federal New Democrats on northern Vancouver Island, in other words, appear in trouble, according to available polls. Their incumbency, in other words, might make no difference, just as it did not make any difference for the former B.C. United MLAs who ran as independents during last year's provincial election. 

"I think that's a good analogy," he said. He added that in Ontario, New Democrats finished with more seats than the provincial Liberals, even though they won fewer votes, because of their local connections. "But this one (election) is different, because it is ultimately a referendum on Trump," he said. 

This point shines through when looking at the issues most important to voters. According to the survey, three-in-ten likely voters (31 per cent, up one per cent) think Canada-U.S. relations to be the most important issue facing the country. Far fewer choose the economy and jobs (19 per cent, minus one per cent), housing, homelessness and poverty (18 per cent, up one per cent), health care (11 per cent, up two) and immigration (five per cent, minus two per cent).

Canseco said these figures play to Carney's strengths, especially among Canadians 55 years and older. Among that age cohort, 40 per cent consider U.S.-Canada relations the most important issue. The issue becomes less important for younger voters, with whom Conservatives are still connecting, Canseco said. 

"But you can't win with that group," he said. "You need to be able to bridge the gap with (voters 55 years and older)," Canseco said. He added that Conservatives tried to do that to a degree with his promise to increase the annual limit on contributions to the tax-free savings account, but only for funds invested in Canadian companies.

"But this group (55 years and older) is completely galvanized by the Trump thing, Canada-U.S. relations and the effect it will have on the economy and jobs," Canseco said. He added that Poilievre needs to discuss what the country would look like if he were Trump's rival. "That is also part of what changed things," he said. "It was fairly easy for Poilievre to go out there and say, 'Justin Trudeau is not respect. This is why we are being called the 51st state." 

But Trump's tone toward Canada has changed since Carney has become prime minister by replacing Trudeau as federal Liberal leader. "He (Poilievre) can't say, 'well, Carney is not respected.'" 

U.S. Climate Youth Lose Decade-Long Lawsuit that Saw Plaintiffs Grow from Childhood to Adulthood

 

U.S. Climate Youth Lose Decade-Long Lawsuit that Saw Plaintiffs Grow from Childhood to Adulthood

The United States Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a petition filed by young climate activists who argued that the federal government’s role in climate change violated their constitutional rights, ending a decade-long legal battle that saw many of the plaintiffs grow from children and teenagers into adults.

The landmark case was filed in 2015 by 21 plaintiffs, the youngest eight years old, The Associated Press reports. They claimed the U.S. government’s actions encouraging a fossil fuel economy violated their right to a life-sustaining climate.

Juliana v. United States, named after plaintiff Kelsey Juliana—was challenged repeatedly by the Obama, Trump, and Biden administrations, whose lawyers argued it sought to direct federal environmental and energy policies through the courts instead of the political process.

Julia Olson, chief legal counsel for Our Children’s Trust, the nonprofit law firm that represented the plaintiffs, said the impact of the lawsuit “cannot be measured by the finality of this case alone.”

Juliana sparked a global youth-led movement for climate rights that continues to grow,” Olson said in a statement Monday. “It has empowered young people to demand their constitutional right to a safe climate and future. We’ve already secured important victories, and we will continue pushing forward.”

What Happened with the Case?

The plaintiffs wanted the court to hold a trial on whether the U.S. government was violating their fundamental rights to life and liberty by operating a fossil fuel-based energy system.

The case wound its way through the legal system for years. At one point in 2018, a trial was halted by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts just days before it was to begin.

In 2020, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the case dismissed, saying the job of determining the nation’s climate policies should fall to politicians, not judges. But U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken in Eugene, Oregon, instead allowed the activists to amend their lawsuit and ruled the case could go to trial.

Last year, acting on a request from the Biden administration, a three-judge 9th Circuit panel issued an order requiring Aiken to dismiss the case, and she did. The plaintiffs then sought, unsuccessfully, to revive the lawsuit through their petition to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Our Children’s Trust, responding to new developments at the federal level, is now preparing a new federal action that is “rooted in the same constitutional principles that guided the Juliana case,” Olson said.

Who Are the Plaintiffs?

The plaintiffs now range from 17 to 29 years old and have continued their climate advocacy to various degrees, Olson said, adding that some are still in university. About half are from hometowns in Oregon, according to Our Children’s Trust’s website.

“They all have incredible stories,” Olson said. “They’re all doing incredible work.”

Juliana, who is now 29, became a primary school teacher in Oregon, said Helen Britto, associate communications director for Our Children’s Trust. Other plaintiffs include Alex Loznak, who became a lawyer focused on environmental and immigration work, and Nathan Baring, who now serves as the program director of a reindeer herding association in Alaska.

“We’re part of a wave, so this is not the end of the road by any means,” Baring said of the high court’s move.

Miko Vergun, who was born in the Marshall Islands and grew up in Beaverton, Oregon, is fighting for a future where the Pacific island nation can stay above sea level, according to Our Children’s Trust’s website. She recently graduated from Oregon State University with a degree in cultural anthropology, Britto said.

In Monday’s statement, Vergun said the U.S. Supreme Court decision wasn’t what the plaintiffs had hoped for, but there had been “many wins along the way.”

“For almost 10 years, we’ve stood up for the rights of present and future generations, demanding a world where we can not only survive, but thrive,” she said. “All great movements have faced obstacles, but what sets them apart is the perseverance of the people behind them. We’ve shown the world that young people will not be ignored, and I’m incredibly proud of the impact Juliana v. United States has made.”

What About Other Youth Climate Lawsuits?

Our Children’s Trust has filed climate legal actions on behalf of young people in all 50 U.S. states, including active cases in Florida, Utah, and Alaska. [And 50 states is all they’re going to get. #ElbowsUp – Ed.]

In a Montana case, the state Supreme Court in December upheld a landmark climate ruling that said the state was violating residents’ constitutional right to a clean environment by permitting oil, gas, and coal projects without regard for global warming, and that regulators must consider the effects of greenhouse gas emissions when they issue permits for fossil fuel development.

The case, brought by 16 youth plaintiffs, had gone to trial in state district court in 2023. The Montana Constitution requires agencies to “maintain and improve” a clean environment, and several other state constitutions contain similar provisions.

The Montana Department of Environmental Quality, which issues permits for fossil fuel projects, has to abide by the state Supreme Court decision, Olson said, adding that Our Children’s Trust will seek to enforce the ruling in the event it is violated.

In a Hawaii case brought by 13 youth over the threat of climate change, both sides reached a settlement last year that requires the state government to achieve zero emissions in its transportation system by 2045. The settlement agreement applies to ground transportation, as well as sea and air transportation between islands. The court will supervise the implementation of the agreement for the next 20 years.

Internationally, the Oregon case has inspired more than 60 youth-led climate lawsuits across the world, according to Our Children’s Trust.

The Canadian Press republished this Associated Press story on March 24, 2025.

RG Richardson City Guides

RG Richardson City Guides
Interactive City and Finance Guides

RG Richardson City Guides

RG Richardson City Guide has over 300 guides let our interactive search city guides do the searching, no more typing and they never go out of date. With over 13,900 preset searches, you only have to click on the preset icon. Search for restaurants, hotels, hostels, Airbnb, pubs, clubs, fast food, coffee shops, real estate, historical sites and facts all just by clicking on the icon. Even how to pack is all there.

Bishop's scold - local police say no big deal

  Bishop’s scolds students after off-campus homecoming party Sherbrooke Record  ·  5 days ago by Matthew Mccully  ·  Education Plans full in...